Long Term Government Bonds: The Largest Bubble & Mania In History

During an interview I posted earlier today with Jim Grant on CNBC he began discussing the interest rates on government bonds, which are now hovering at close to 0% for many of the world's developed economies, and he had to stop and chuckle for a moment when thinking about the ridiculous nature of this concept.

I have studied bubbles in depth going back through hundreds of years of history. I have discussed how investments move through four stages of a bull market cycle:

1. Pessimism
2. Skepticism
3. Optimism
4. Mania

I want to take a look at an investment class now that has entered this fourth stage. This is always the most fun point to watch in a market because to the casual observer, the media, and the average financial advisor it not only appears that nothing is wrong; they fall all over themselves to say that you should invest in it.

You know an asset has reached the mania/bubble stage when you begin to see the supply of the particular asset move higher alongside an equal if not greater spike in price. The first lesson in economics tells you that this is the exact opposite of how supply/demand should exist alongside price.

However, when the mania sets in and prices continue to rise, people always, always, always come to the conclusion that "this time is different." They will find an unlimited amount of reasons to justify the price increases.

When looking at the NASDAQ Internet stocks in the late 1990's there was a steady stream of Internet IPO's that entered the market. During the final stage it turned into a flood where hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of new companies were entering the market with no earnings and the future promise of "eyeballs" and "clicks," two very common terms used back in those days. They flooded the market with an enormous supply of shares and those shares rocketed higher in price.

Broadband companies that installed underground wiring were priced to deliver wiring in every square inch of the planet (even though 70% of our planet had no need for broadband cables underground). They began installing cable underground in areas that could never use it. The price of the stock surged alongside the supply of new cables put down. It was a mania in every sense of the word and as stock prices roses higher and higher there were an unlimited amount of analysts explaining how "this time was different." The idea of supply vs. demand was now irrelevant.

Then stocks collapsed in March of 2000.

We moved on next to the real estate market where the supply/price dynamic was far easier to see, yet the rising prices blinded those inside the bubble almost worse than the NASDAQ bubble. A home builder in northern Virginia where I was living during the peak of the insanity built 9 spec homes for one buyer. The buyer had no plans on closing on any of the properties. He planned to do a simultaneous closing for each property and pocket $50,000 in appreciation for each one. The enormous supply of empty homes going up coincided with massive increases in price month after month. Realtors told buyers that "this time was different."

Then home prices collapsed in February of 2006.

The following chart shows the supply of United States debt since 1940. The government still owes this money, meaning the supply is still outstanding, because they have not defaulted on their debt at any point during this period. The total deficit of the United States represents current the supply of treasury bonds outstanding.

You can see on the chart that the supply of treasury bonds has become parabolic in growth, similar to IPO share issuance in 1999 and new homes being built in 2005. If you provided this chart to a freshman level economics major and ask him to draw a corresponding graph in terms of price, he would provide you with something like the following. The red line would show supply increasing, and the blue line would show prices falling as supply moved higher.

The following graph is the actual price of 10 year treasury bonds going back 220 years. Treasury bonds are not touching new highs to represent the danger of this growing supply, they have recently moved below the all time record low yield in history set back in the 1940's. When interest rates fall it means the price of a bond, the underlying asset, moves up in value. Treasuries are more expensive today than at any point in the history of the United States.

The following is the front page of the most recent addition of Barron's magazine. It asks, "What's The Best Bond Fund For You?"

The average American, since the financial crisis erupted in the fall of 2008, has slowly and steadily removed their money from stock funds and piled into bond funds. They are terrified of the stock market falling again, and they are moving into the asset class that their financial advisor says "may have a small return but at least it won't fall in price." The following chart shows the amount of money leaving stock only funds ($545 billion) and entering bond funds ($630 billion) since January 2007.

In 2011 long dated treasury bonds were up over 30% (remember bonds appreciate in value when rates fall). They were one of the best performing assets on the planet.

Treasury bonds have risen in price so far and for so long (30 years) that people cannot even remember a time when yields rose (and bond prices fell). People hear that the United States is adding another $1-$2 trillion in supply every year for at least the next ten years and they want more; just as in 2005 when they heard that home builders were selling an endless amount of empty homes to speculators and they wanted more. The rising prices have put a calm, a numbing feeling, into everyone in the market.

When interest rates begin to rise, and I assure you that they will, it is going to cause more damage to our economy and the savings of investors than the stock market bubble of 2000 and the real estate bubble of 2006 combined.

As treasury bond yields rise so will yields on corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgages, and commercial real estate cap rates. Everyone that has priced the 10 year treasury bond into their financial model looking forward is going to be slaughtered.

If interest rates double on a 10 or 30 year treasury bond it means the value of your investment has been cut in half. The average investor has spent the last four years putting their savings into the safety on an enormous time bomb. They will be slaughtered.

When will the mania end? I have no idea. Is it worth dancing on an atomic bomb for a 1.5% return on your money per year? That is up to you. It does not sound like an attractive idea to me. The downside is endless, the upside is extremely minimal.

This same exact story is taking place on the shores of Japan and the UK, and I believe their debt bombs will explode before the United States. But why wait to find out? For 1.5% per year? It is like guessing where to put your money: Spain or Italy. Why put it into either one?

Get your money out of harms way, and if you are very brave and very patient then place a bet on the short of the trade. Those that have the ability and staying power to hold a short position on these debt markets, such as now legendary hedge fund manager Kyle Bass who has an enormous short position on Japanese debt, will be the new subprime characters in Michael Lewis' next novel.

For more on where we stand in the current stock market cycle see P/E Ratios: Stocks Priced For Collapse.


  1. Terrific post as usual.

  2. "Get your money out of harms way"

    Ahhh, that's the fundamental issue ... exactly where is money safe today. And speaking of money, I'm not even sure what it is any more.

    Seriously though, what asset class other than PMs is a relative safe haven? (I'll exclude PMs because that subject already gets extensive coverage and there's the ol 'all eggs in one basket' issue if one commits to just a single sector.

  3. Precious metals exposure and safe cash. Short term T-Bills and a laddered bond fund with very short term bonds in safe currencies. Low returns and capital preservation.

    I'll be discussing laddered bond funds in the weeks ahead. Speak to a professional before making any portfolio decisions.

  4. Hi,

    Thanks for all your effort in putting these post together. I am with you in the general theme. In this post you mention that Japan, along with the UK, will suffer from a debt blow-up. I've heard the argument from Kyle Bass and, again, his thesis is sound. What do you make of article such as the following one that asks, "Is Kyle Bass Wrong?".


    I am interested in this trade but can't afford to be early.

    I appreciate your work Tuna.

  5. I appreciate the comment. I read that article on CNBC when it was first released. It will be one to hold onto when Japan begins to tremor and Bass' trades start to skyrocket.

    People are second guessing him because he has lost a significant amount of money on the trade in the last year (shorting Japanese government bonds). He also lost a ton of money on the subprime shorts during the 18 months just before the implosion.

    It is just a matter of time for Japan. In many ways they are far worse off than Greece, Spain, and Italy but people only follow the news and markets in a reactionary manner.

    If you can't stomach taking losses in the short term it is not a strong trade. Shorting Japanese bonds has been dubbed the "widow maker" because it has hurt so many investors over the past decade.

  6. Thanks Tuna for your reply. I understand your point entirely and it's true that people are making the judgement on Bass with a lot of short-termism. You articulate the point of making judgements on a longer term in your writing and I definitely appreciate that. It helps keep one focused and less susectible to the 'noise'.


  7. Is it as dangerous to hold bond as you say, even if you let it mature?
    If we imagine the government wont default.

  8. It is only dangerous in that you have currency risk. For example, if a bond provides you 1.5% interest per year and the inflation rate is running at 3.5% interest then you are losing 2% per year in purchasing power.

    So if you buy a 10 year treasury bond and rates rise to 7% in two years you can definitely hold it for 10 years and not lose in terms of capital gains. But if inflation is running at 7% per year during that time then you are stuck with either selling the bond at a huge loss or sitting by and watching your purchasing power disappear.

  9. Thank you for the quick and useful answer! I agree with you, longer term bonds are definitely in a bubble. According with the Austrian economics we have two outcomes of these crises, either end the addiction to cheap credit and see malinvestment fail and hit the stock market, housing market and bond market hard. Or see the destruction of our currency through inflation when the central bank tries to save the economy with QE (and as everyone knows high inflation means high rates).

    One question remains; where should I invest my money? Physical gold or is paper gold an option?


Post a Comment