Newton's Cradle: Visualizing Asset Prices Through Capital Movement
This conversation is going to delve into more personal parts of my life than I have discussed in the past. I do this to provide a different point of view on the way markets and assets can be viewed around the world.
People like
to put labels on people within the financial markets. Over the past few years I have said that I
was “raising cash” and during large sell offs at times I was purchasing gold and silver.
This one sentence would put a general label around me that I am something called a "bear." If I was currently interested in purchasing stocks or real estate I would be labeled a "bull." The mainstream financial media hosts segments during their daily telecasts called "Bull vs. Bear" based on someone's belief on where stocks are going tomorrow.
This is the
complete opposite way that I look at the world.
I take in a
tremendous amount of financial information on a day to day basis. This involves
reading articles, books, and tracking markets. I don’t take in this information
and then try to decide if “the world is ending” or if “the world is booming” in some black and white fashion. That’s not how it works.
When I close
my eyes, I imagine capital moving all around the world. This incredible process
has been taking place for centuries. When capital flows, as I have tried to discuss here over the last few years, it does not always move
in a perfectly efficient manner as many text books teach (the efficient market theory). These books feel that markets are always efficient, therefore the best thing you can do is
create a diversified portfolio that will appreciate over the long term. If you believe the markets are efficient then you can design algorithms that will profit as they revert back to their means or what these professionals tell the computer is a harmonious market.
I believe that
due to the combination of human emotion and psychology, which is the
fundamental engine that drives the movement of capital flows, every asset on
the planet swings from under valuation to over valuation. Is simple terms, I believe that markets are not efficient. This can be
described using many terms but I like to think of it as cycles. Long term secular cycles lasting 15 to 20
years, to cyclical cycles within those longer term trends. I could write an entire text book on the topic of cycles so I will save further discussion for another day.
For hundreds
of years markets have moved from pessimism to skepticism to optimism to
euphoria. This process has creates both large and small “bubbles” that then
burst. Based on countless hours studying human psychology and the impact on
markets, I do not see this process ever stopping.
Before I begin to describe real capital flows, the best visual I can provide of this process is through Newton's Cradle. As capital travels toward an investment or investment class, it moves from under valuation at one extreme and keeps pushing through until it reaches the maximum point of over valuation. It then reverses and moves back the other direction as there is no more force (capital) available or willing to push it higher. This is the continuous process, both long term and short term, that markets cycle through:
In this overly simplistic example we will describe the current capital flows moving around the world as "yield on" vs. "yield off."
Most of the assets I own today provide no yield. The reason for this is because these assets are currently out of favor. Sentiment is low. I like cash today because no one wants cash. People today want assets that yield something, not assets that yield nothing. Examples of these higher yielding assets are stocks, bonds, and real estate.
Most of the assets I own today provide no yield. The reason for this is because these assets are currently out of favor. Sentiment is low. I like cash today because no one wants cash. People today want assets that yield something, not assets that yield nothing. Examples of these higher yielding assets are stocks, bonds, and real estate.
I believe
that sentiment toward “yielding” assets is currently high, meaning a large amount of capital is flowing toward these sectors. When that
happens, prices rise, and become overvalued.
Many of
these assets can be purchased with leverage. That means that not only do
investors want to buy them, but they are willing to go into debt to bet on
prices going higher. In some ways this leverage and euphoria is now even
more extreme than what occurred in 2006-2007.
Red line below shows the net margin debt (borrowing to buy stocks) at the NYSE:
Red line below shows the net margin debt (borrowing to buy stocks) at the NYSE:
In the fall
of 2008 the movement of capital changed. Investors did not care about what the
yield was on their assets, they cared about the return of their principle. This
created a rush to cash. Yielding assets fell in price as capital flows moved away
from these sectors, and these assets became under valued. Cash become over
valued.
During late
2008 through early 2010 I was interested in selling cash to buy yielding assets. Now
I am doing the exact opposite.
To take this
a step further, you can begin to find assets within the realm of cash (no yield asset) or currency
that move in and out of favor. For example, over the summer the Brazilian Real (currency) fell and I moved some of my cash into that currency. A few weeks ago I
was purchasing the Canadian dollar. Today I am purchasing silver (I view
precious metals as form of cash) and the South African Rand (currency) because they are both out
of favor with investors.
Does this
mean that I am bullish or bearish? No, I am thinking about global capital flows
and making investment decisions based on fundamental under/overvaluation and
sentiment.
At some
point, I don’t know if it will be tomorrow, December, or 2017, yielding assets will reach a certain extreme level in price where investors will no longer be willing or able to pay, or more importantly in today's world have the ability to borrow to pay, to purchase more. Investors will begin to
move back to the other side of the ship. I certainly do not care when that
occurs, I just need to be cognizant that this change is taking place and adjust
my capital position accordingly. It is not a complex mathematical science, it is just a
common sense understanding of human nature and the ability to act rationally.
The DOW
reaching 16,000, 17,000, or 20,000 has no impact on how I view stocks because I
am not viewing them with emotion. If real estate prices explode higher, or bond
yields fall lower, that does not make them a better investment. With common sense you can see that it makes them a far worse investment.
At some
point the current “rush for yield” will reverse. There will be rush for cash. I
will sell my cash and move into yielding investments.
I’ll take
this a step further and get a little more personal into my own life. My view of
global capital flows impacts decision I make beyond just my personal investment portfolio. It impacts how I spend the “business” hours of my day to day life.
Longer term
readers of this site know that since this site originated in mid 2008 I felt capital would be moving away from residential real estate (specifically in the United States though it has been more extreme
in other areas of the world). As capital moved away, real estate prices fell
for close to four years in the residential market. As investors began their rush toward
yield some large funds have moved into the residential real estate market and have begun to
push prices higher in some areas.
This occurred back in 2010 for the apartment sector as investors looked at that market (and continue to look at that market) as a great location for a strong yield.
This occurred back in 2010 for the apartment sector as investors looked at that market (and continue to look at that market) as a great location for a strong yield.
When
investors move away from yielding assets at some point in the future I think
the real estate market will be impacted in a negative way. During the coming transition out of "high yield" investments I want to be
purchasing stocks and bonds when they go on sale but real estate has specific traits
that makes it even more appealing: the amount of leverage available to purchase
it, tax advantages, and the control you have over the asset.
The
difference between real estate and paper assets (stocks/bonds) is that it takes
a larger skill set in order to participate successfully in the market. You have to know how
to finance properties, handle everything that is involved during the
acquisition process, and manage the properties once they are acquired (this is
far more important if you are interested in the commercial/multifamily sector).
I think the
U.S. apartment market is one of the most overvalued sectors in the world right
now. Why? Because capital has been, and continues to, rush toward that sector.
At some point, and I have no idea when it will occur, this process will
reverse. Capital will eventually move on to another asset class somewhere in
the world when prices reach a certain extreme.
Knowing
this, my goal in the present moment today is to be as ready as possible for when
capital moves away from the asset class and it becomes undervalued.
I recently
spent two years managing a 500 unit apartment community. I spent my days learning how to efficiently manage the daily operations, cut costs in a budget, and most importantly manage the team that works there. Rather than try to read it in a book, I felt the best way
to learn would be to do it myself. I can drive in to a community today and “feel”
how it is being run both inside the management office and walking through the
property.
My business
hours during the week now are spent in large part working at one of the largest
commercial real estate finance companies in the country. I spend my days
churning through and analyzing the financial statements of apartment
communities all over the country that are being bought, sold, or refinanced. I
am surrounded on the floor that I work by the most gifted minds in the country on
commercial real estate finance, and I am doing everything possible to train myself to become machine at taking in and analyzing data on a property.
I have not
spent years working and learning about the multifamily business because I think
it has a great short term future. In fact, it is
for the exact opposite reason.
I want to be
as ready as humanly possible to purchase as much real estate as possible when
capital moves away from the asset class at some point in the years ahead. The apartment market has tremendous long term fundamentals with the key demand demographic, those aged 25 to 34, set to grow steadily over the next two decades.
I don’t “like”
cash as an investment. It is a terrible long term investment. I own cash today because capital is moving away from it. Capital is flooding, with
full force, toward yield in any and every form.
I look forward to the day when this site can be focused on buying
stocks, bonds, and real estate, which is far more exciting conversation. I can’t
wait to sell the silver I bought back in 2005, or the Brazilian Reals I bought
last summer for something that provides a yield. I have no control over when
that day will be, and it really does not matter to me if it is 6 months from
now or 6 years from now.
Like the
ocean tides, the cycles will change, investors will continue to behave
irrationally, and certain investment classes will become under and over-valued.
This process
has nothing to do with “doom and gloom” or "positive projections" only understanding that the world
changes and capital is moving at every second of every day. It is the ultimate
sport, something you can spend your entire life trying to master.
Comments
Post a Comment